Besides a lot of Axilian word salad we have to note that::
Nuclear reactions do not at all follow the law of quantum mechanics. QM
is a first order approximation for the far field *potential interaction*
only. QM is an engineering theory and for this purpose it works well enough.
After 100 year failure to find any QM connection for nuclear processes I
sometimes wonder why people still uphold this fringe approach.
The strong force myth has been fully debunked by B.Schaeffer
https://www.google.ch/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjW9tb_iM_0AhUjhv0HHUXXAxsQFnoECBQQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocplayer.net%2F83778110-Aes-2016-malaga-spain.html&usg=AOvVaw196fS5Fh4R7wyXL9k0Gf9q
--> "Electromagnetic Nuclear Physics"
Same for QM like orbits of nuclear orbital charge. See Sardin:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330825167
Charge structure is toroidal!
J.W.
On 06.12.2021 11:11, Axil Axil wrote:
Because the nuclear level processes that occur in the Reaction are
confined to a quantum mechanical system that is coherent, that
nuclear reaction is not possible to observe. This means that if
particles are generated and energy is produced, those particles and
that energy is not observable to the observer. This is known as the
"Measurement problem".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kxmR82QMN8
After the coherence of the quantum system is destroyed, the quantum
system becomes a classical system in which energy can be observed. But
this energy is not nuclear energy but energy derived from the vacuum
as rendered by "vacuum decay" where a small amount of residual energy
and matter stored in the quantum system is released in a disruptive
process of system disintegration and therefore such residual matter
and energy becomes observable.
There is a causal disconnection between the processes that happen in
which the quantum system is coherent and the disrupted release of
stored residual matter and energy that is released during the
destruction of the erstwhile quantum system.
If particles were produced during the time when the quantum system was
coherent, those particles would not have been observable. It is a
fool's errand to try to make sence of the quantum processes that
had occured when the quantum system was coherent. This observation and
its understanding is not possible because the expectations of the
classical world do not apply to the processes that were quantum
coherent and rendered unobservable.
On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 8:39 PM bobcook39...@hotmail.com
<bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Nuclear magmatic resonance [phenomena are the basis for the desogn
and operation of common MRI maschines of used by the medical
business.
A metastable nuclear at a small energy above the stable state of a
target isotope is produced by a radio frequency photon in
resonance with the differential energy between the 2 states.
A magnetic field is applied to the target isotope to allow a
resonant to react with the isotope and raise its energy slightly.
The magnetic is shut off and the target isotope returns to is
grouind state with the emission of a photon to conserve energy and
angular momentum of the QM system.
LOW ENERGY NUCLEAR REACTIONS ARE REAL . A RECOIL OF THE ISOTOPE
OCCURS WHEN THE PHIOTON IS EMITTED TO CONSERVE MOMENTOM. angular
IS ALSO CONSERVED BY THE PHOTON AS I RECALL.
Bob Cook
PS: My work with NMR was 60 years ago in 19621.
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>
for Windows
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
*Sent:* Saturday, December 4, 2021 5:59:44 PM
*To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Freire et al., Preliminary survey on cold fusion
Thankyou for your opinion. A nuclear reaction produces energy from
a change in the binding energy of the nucleus. When this binding
energy changes, the nucleus will become unstable where the
liberated binding energy is oftentimes carried away by a
particle(s) exiting the nucleus.
If the Reaction is based on a nuclear reaction, particle
emissions are to be expected. The lack of particle emissions in
the Reaction was and still is a major factor in the lack of
acceptance by the science community that the nuclear based
explanation of the Reaction is real.
By the way, Holmlid's observation that particles were produced by
his Reaction has not been seen by his replicators. It looks like
what Holmlid was seeing were EVOs produced by the ultra dense
hydrogen as detected by Sveinn Ólafsson 's cloud chamber.
On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 8:01 PM Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch>
wrote:
Axil,
You basically are a nonsense talker with no clue of real dense
matter physics.
A particle emission is associated with a momentum. How do you
believe that mass at rest can produce
this???????????????????????????????
J.W.
On 04.12.2021 19:36, Axil Axil wrote:
Also identify what fusion and/or fission reaction that this
gamma radiation is coming from. Show proof that this
radiation is associated with particle emissions. Nuclear
reactions produce well defined particle emissions. Also
explain how the reaction is being produced. Keep in mind that
high energy radiation can be produced by breaking radiation
from high energy electrons. These high energy electron based
wide continuous spectrum reactions are not necessarily
nuclear reactions.
On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 1:10 PM Jürg Wyttenbach
<ju...@datamart.ch> wrote:
May be soon if the standard model mafia will not oppose....
J.W.
On 04.12.2021 18:59, Jones Beene wrote:
Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
Axil, I can send you any time a gamma spectrum with 300
active lines from a cold fusion reaction...
-----
Is this work published?
It should be included in the LENR/CANR library,
especially if the gamma lines support a theory
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06
