https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Be3HlA_9968
Consider a quantum system of a mix of a barrel of balls of many colors. The barrel is spinning and the balls are being mixed. While the balls are all being mixed, the color of the solution or final state of the system is not known. To observe the state (color) that the system is in, the barrel must be stopped from rotating and the observer must extract a colored ball from the stationary barrel. The color of that ball is the resolution of the observation. The condition of many colored balls is called superposition. A system can be many things all at the same time and that system changes among those many conditions at random from one instant to the next. A system may resolve into one of these many states when the system terminates (The barrel stops rotating) and the color of the selected ball is observed. Quantum mechanics does not follow the scientific method, it is not reductionist. It is a system that follows probability because randomization among many possible states is involved “God does not play dice with the universe; He plays an ineffable game of His own devising, which might be compared, from the perspective of any of the other players [i.e. everybody], to being involved in an obscure and complex variant of poker in a pitch-dark room, with blank cards, for infinite stakes, with a Dealer who won't tell you the rules, and who *smiles all the time*.” On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 1:30 PM bobcook39...@hotmail.com < bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Axil Axil— > > > > I consider the physics discussed in the items you have referenced do not > have a logical basis, since there is no assumption of cause and effect. > This situation avoid the application of the scientific method IMHO. > > > > SMOKE AND MIRROWS come to mind. A better summary than > > energy being coughed up by the vacuum would be the “hand of God” takes > charge of the collapse of QM systems when humans look too closely. > > > > > > Bob Cook > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows > > > > *From: *Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > *Sent: *Monday, December 6, 2021 2:11 AM > *To: *vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Freire et al., Preliminary survey on cold fusion > > > > Because the nuclear level processes that occur in the Reaction are > confined to a quantum mechanical system that is coherent, that > nuclear reaction is not possible to observe. This means that if particles > are generated and energy is produced, those particles and that energy is > not observable to the observer. This is known as the "Measurement problem". > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kxmR82QMN8 > > > > After the coherence of the quantum system is destroyed, the quantum system > becomes a classical system in which energy can be observed. But this energy > is not nuclear energy but energy derived from the vacuum as rendered by > "vacuum decay" where a small amount of residual energy and matter stored in > the quantum system is released in a disruptive process of > system disintegration and therefore such residual matter and energy > becomes observable. > > > > There is a causal disconnection between the processes that happen in which > the quantum system is coherent and the disrupted release of stored residual > matter and energy that is released during the destruction of the erstwhile > quantum system. > > > > If particles were produced during the time when the quantum system was > coherent, those particles would not have been observable. It is a fool's > errand to try to make sence of the quantum processes that had occured when > the quantum system was coherent. This observation and its understanding is > not possible because the expectations of the classical world do not apply > to the processes that were quantum coherent and rendered unobservable. > > > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 8:39 PM bobcook39...@hotmail.com < > bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Nuclear magmatic resonance [phenomena are the basis for the desogn and > operation of common MRI maschines of used by the medical business. > > > > A metastable nuclear at a small energy above the stable state of a target > isotope is produced by a radio frequency photon in resonance with the > differential energy between the 2 states. > > > > A magnetic field is applied to the target isotope to allow a resonant > to react with the isotope and raise its energy slightly. > > > > The magnetic is shut off and the target isotope returns to is grouind > state with the emission of a photon to conserve energy and angular momentum > of the QM system. > > > > LOW ENERGY NUCLEAR REACTIONS ARE REAL . A RECOIL OF THE ISOTOPE OCCURS > WHEN THE PHIOTON IS EMITTED TO CONSERVE MOMENTOM. angular IS ALSO > CONSERVED BY THE PHOTON AS I RECALL. > > > > Bob Cook > > > > PS: My work with NMR was 60 years ago in 19621. > > > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows > > > > *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Saturday, December 4, 2021 5:59:44 PM > *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Freire et al., Preliminary survey on cold fusion > > > > Thankyou for your opinion. A nuclear reaction produces energy from a > change in the binding energy of the nucleus. When this binding energy > changes, the nucleus will become unstable where the liberated binding > energy is oftentimes carried away by a particle(s) exiting the nucleus. > > > > If the Reaction is based on a nuclear reaction, particle emissions are to > be expected. The lack of particle emissions in the Reaction was and still > is a major factor in the lack of acceptance by the science community that > the nuclear based explanation of the Reaction is real. > > > > By the way, Holmlid's observation that particles were produced by his > Reaction has not been seen by his replicators. It looks like what Holmlid > was seeing were EVOs produced by the ultra dense hydrogen as detected by > Sveinn > Ólafsson 's cloud chamber. > > > > On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 8:01 PM Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch> wrote: > > Axil, > > > > You basically are a nonsense talker with no clue of real dense matter > physics. > > A particle emission is associated with a momentum. How do you believe > that mass at rest can produce this??????????????????????????????? > > > > > > J.W. > > On 04.12.2021 19:36, Axil Axil wrote: > > Also identify what fusion and/or fission reaction that this gamma > radiation is coming from. Show proof that this radiation is associated with > particle emissions. Nuclear reactions produce well defined > particle emissions. Also explain how the reaction is being produced. Keep > in mind that high energy radiation can be produced by breaking radiation > from high energy electrons. These high energy electron based wide > continuous spectrum reactions are not necessarily nuclear reactions. > > > > On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 1:10 PM Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch> wrote: > > May be soon if the standard model mafia will not oppose.... > > > > J.W. > > On 04.12.2021 18:59, Jones Beene wrote: > > > > Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: > > > > Axil, I can send you any time a gamma spectrum with 300 active lines from > a cold fusion reaction... > > ----- > > > > Is this work published? > > > > It should be included in the LENR/CANR library, especially if the gamma > lines support a theory > > -- > > Jürg Wyttenbach > > Bifangstr. 22 > > 8910 Affoltern am Albis > > > > +41 44 760 14 18 > > +41 79 246 36 06 > > -- > > Jürg Wyttenbach > > Bifangstr. 22 > > 8910 Affoltern am Albis > > > > +41 44 760 14 18 > > +41 79 246 36 06 > > >
