Paul stop antagonizing people it's not fun any more. Michel
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 8:00 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Quantum Thermodynamics > Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: > > > >> Some would say that's passive aggressive Stephen A. Lawrence. > > > > Just a little bit of an ad hominem? I guess "some" means you, eh? > > > Yes, I think you are passive aggressive. I think you have a negative > interpretation to my statements. I am very direct and address what people > say-- > not ad hominem. > > > > > > you have not attacked me _because_ I had learned a little electrical > > engineering. > > > Attack is your POV. I call it how I see it, state my mind, and do not make > statements to hurt people. Rather, such statements are what I believe. > > I think you left the discussion because I found direct error in your science. > > > > > >> Please let me know if you ever want to debate the idea that your > >> passive aggressive ways of life is better than my direct ways of life. > > > > Have you completely dropped the science arguments, and totally replaced > > them with ad hominem attacks? > > > No I have not resorted to ad hominem. Ad hominem is when a person attacks > for > the purpose of not address the issue. Show me what I am not addressing? > Please > by all means, back up your statement. IMHO your statement is pure fuzzy > logic. > I put forth effort to directly address your statements, and did indeed > address > your statements regarding my theory. No I am not perfect and cannot reply to > every one of your sentences due to time! Furthermore, look at my recent > posts > and you'll see I am challenging everyone to find holes in my claims. It's > funny > that you have not replied to such a challenge. Rather, of recent you prefer > only > to reply to my philosophy statements, lol. > > If you want to continue these personal issue then please send me a private > email > and we'll post here the final results. Yes, that's another challenge for you > to > back up your words. > > > I have been waiting for someone to answer my question to nail down his or her > stance, but it seems nobody is perhaps brave enough. Once people answer the > question then I will provide a specific circuit example demonstrating how > energy > captured from thermal noise can be stored in a capacitor, which is a form of > battery. So then answer this Stephen A. Lawrence --> > > If I can demonstrate how you can permanently store energy in to a capacitor > taken from ambient temperature then for the sake of spreading truth will you > public admit I am correct? No I am not trying to trick you with temperature > gradients or radiation from an external source such as a radio station or > electric ground potential gradients, etc. etc. I am talking about a device > that > utilizes thermal voltage noise at room temperature-- Vn = sqrt(4 K T R dF) > > > > Regards, > Paul Lowrance >
