Nick Palmer wrote:
[snip]
Paul is an extraordinarily arrogant thug. If it
is possible to effectively cohere Nyquist "noise", I hope Charles can do
it. Similarly,
I hope Paul never succeeds.
Neither is ever likely to get
useful power from ambient temperature. By the way,
the ridiculous debate about the radiation from "both
sides" has mutated slightly - Paul originally said it radiates
X watts PER SQUARE METRE from both sides.
He is now leaving out the capitalised part (because
> he secretly realises his mistake and is hoping that we
won't notice...).
I'm sorry dear brother, but IMHO you sure warp your reality. You place thoughts
in your head thinking you know what I'm thinking.
I wish you the best, as IMHO you have a world of anger & hate inside you.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
As "both sides" of the object have twice the surface
area of one side plus a small bit extra from the edges (but this is
getting silly...) it logically follows that the amount of radiation
should be twice the figure Paul used (as Horace immediately pointed
out). Paul was guilty of "fuzzy logic" Q.E.D. Michel pointed out that
Paul's phraseology was ambiguous and he is French!! Why should we need
an English major to verify something that is obvious (except to an
arrogant troll). Crawl away back under your rock Paul, re-read John
Winterflood's comprehensive demolition of your idea, and stop bothering us.
Emotionally, but correctly, yours
