One more important detail to add:
We want to push the oscillation of the barbell to resonance at the same
time as increase the amplitude of asymmetrical jerk (cross vector). Both
of these two isotopes H and D - have a strong magnetic moment, but a
significantly different moment, and also a very significantly
different NMR resonance. This is a recipe for splitting at low energy.
These atoms H and D have the single electron which if "locked" in
one orbit is like a solenoid coil whose effective magnetic field can be
calculated. As felt by the D nucleus - that field is 12.5 Tesla ! This
assumes a perfectly planar electron spin orbital of course, and no one
knows how this would actually look in Ice-X.
The 3 frequencies of interest for the neutron, proton and the nucleus as
a whole, in deuterium NMR are NOT dictated by the external field per se,
in this situation - but by the close proximity of the (effective) 12.5
Tesla field from the atomic electron. When this electron is itself
aligned by an external field, the nucleus only "feels" this closer
field, according to Letts and according to logic.
When sitting in this magnetic field created by the orbital electron, the
nucleus becomes NMR resonant at 365 Mhz, 533 Mhz, and/or 82 MHz (for the
neutron, proton and the nucleus as a whole). However, if there is any
"springiness" at all in the barbell gluon linkage, then successive
pulses of RF at 365 Mhz, followed very closely by a pulse at 533 Mhz
(and then the sequence repeated either sequentially or randomly) will
likely test the strength of that bond.
When one end of the barbell is
stimulated at its resonant RF and the other fells its different resonant
frequency- will the "bar" - i.e. the gluon spring, as it were - ever be
extended further (either axially or in another vector) than the short
reach of the strong force (which BTW is not much further afield, in this
nucleus than the furthest extremity of its normal elongation) ?
Inquiring minds want to know...
Jones
BTW, Dennis Letts did invent a specific LENR cell - and co-authored a
paper with John Bockris on how these same NMR frequencies of Deuterium
might be used to trigger the "cold fusion heat effect" in Deuterated
Palladium. The paper was peer reviewed and published in FUSION
TECHNOLOGY in 1994 : "Triggering of Heat and Sub-surface changes in Pd-D
Systems." (Bockris, Sundaresan, Letts, Minevski).
Letts demonstrated the effect in 1993 in the laboratories of ENECO in
Salt Lake City, in the presence of two PhD's: John Bockris and Gale
Thorne. He was able to demonstrate a clear connection between the
presence of a few milliwatts of RF at these frequencies and an increases
of several watts in the thermal output of Deuterated Palladium systems
but... get this ... he was never, thereafter, able to re-create the
effect in Texas despite much effort !!
Again - one wonders about three particular variables which are generally
unaccounted for in LENR experiments:
1) Location - There are a number of peculiarities about Salt Lake City
and other locations- high altitude, dryness, a large body of brine
(giant capacitor ?) Fred Sparber has hypothetically connected this
location to the success of the Moray device - as well as to P&F.
2) The Heavy water itself: the ratio of 18O/16O and/or metastability
3) The Tiller effect. Is that effect heightened in an area where other
strong beliefs are prevalent?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_A._Tiller
To counter these 3:
Perhaps cryogenics is the one additional factor which would nullify the
importance of these unaccounted variables- which can make a marginally
successful experiment seem more robust than it should...
