On 4/2/2008 11:27 PM, R.C.Macaulay wrote: > Howdy Vorts, > > We best leave the debate of Creationism vs. Evolution to the academians > since they are the intellectuals. > > After all the talk is finished there remains one central word that has never > been examined in regards to the pros and cons. > > That word is "TIME". Forget about how long ago the universe was formed, > created, hammered together or molded. > If time has always been.. we are faced with a concept that it is "eternal' > no beginning and no end. > This would mean... that starting today, regardless of how much time goes by > in the future, that amount of time that elapses will never be greater than > the time that has already gone by.
Is this intended as an argument against an "eternal" universe? > The simple fact that both time and distance can be measured overweighs the > the chance subscribed by evolutionists.. The measure and the thing being measured are not necessarily one and the same thing. > Forget the physical ..the rocks and stars above.. explain how time could be > an "accident" and not by design. > Whenever I listen to people debating evolution I pull out my Mickey Mouse > watch and yardstick and ask ..If you are so intelligent to debate something > .. start with explaining this darn watch. > Time is a watch? Harry
