In reply to OrionWorks's message of Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:28:20 -0500: Hi, [snip] >However, to publicly >speculate about such a possibility might be considered so disruptive >to the economic fabric of our society that I wonder if McKubre >deliberately chose not to go there. [snip] You mention "disruption" is if that were a bad thing. Some economic disruptions are highly beneficial, and this is one example. In fact "improvement" might be a better word than "disruption" in this case. There should be "no doubt" that virtually unlimited cheap energy would provide a tremendous economic boost to every nation on Earth, not to mention the added bonuses of limitless fresh water (through desalination), a reduction in the greenhouse effect, and a huge increase in the feasibility of waste recycling, to the point where essentially all waste can be cheaply recycled, resulting in a huge reduction in environmental pollution. Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
