2009/9/10 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com>: > At 09:56 AM 9/9/2009, Michel Jullian wrote: > >> I also recall an old SPAWAR codeposition experiment claiming to >> produce tritium, which they mentioned in a recent review of their >> work. If that was not bogus, tritium being very easy to detect >> unmistakably, what else is needed to prove CF is indisputably real? We >> need ONE SINGLE multiply replicated positive experiment to defend, not >> tens, not hundreds, as I am sure you agree considering your present >> approach. > > Yes, precisely. Actually, I'm looking for more than one, and especially more > than one suggestion, but, really, one is the point. If we don't have one, it > doesn't matter, eh? >
Absolutely. The tritium producing SPAWAR experiment I was talking about was discussed here in January: http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg29943.html and in the ensuing discussion, where Horace was already writing (in msg 29965) "However, it seems to me the CF community needs to home in on one, just one, highly repeatable, unambiguous, cheap and easy experiment to demonstrate that CF is real. So far we've not done a good job of that." So, let's do just that, shall we? Michel
