Dr. Swartz,
I gather you do not see eye-to-eye with Mr. Rothwell on certain experimental procedures. That in itself is not an unusual development, particularly as researchers go about collecting data on the frontiers of what most in our society are likely to consider to be an unconventional science. Certainly, there will continue to be disagreements concerning how best to record experimental data. I gather the art of collecting accurate calorimetry data can be exceedingly difficult. I've heard that many physicists loath to deal with any kind of recorded heat collected through calorimetry. In the meantime, what do you expect to gain by claiming that Mr. Rothwell has been caught "...frothing at the mouth again." Does this indicate a new form of anomalous heat that CF researchers ought to research, assuming we correctly account for the effects of Bernard instability? BTW, I haven't a clue what "Barnard instability" is. I suppose I could look up at Wiki, assuming it isn't another one of those forbidden topics. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benard_instability Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
