Dear Mr William:
We used that extreme mode, closed doors, also for many hours, sometimes having
troubles to stop the reactor.
To stop the rreactor we cut the injection of hydrogen and increase the water
flow to cool down the reactor.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
________________________________
From: noone noone <thesteornpa...@yahoo.com>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, January 22, 2011 9:09:28 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Monday Update to Release Information on Self Sustain Mode
Dear Mr Brian Robertson:
I again want to return on your comment, because it is very important, and I
forgot to say a thing that I deem important too.
The same Professors of the University of Bologna who made the test of the 14th
of January, had made a preliminar test, closed doors, on the 17th of December
2010.
During that preliminar test, made to check the idoneity of their
instrumentation, being closed doors we could make a mode of operation that,
for
safety issues, I cannot make in public, it is they made the reactor go also
without the drive of the electric resistance. This preliminar test will also
be
described in the report that will be published on monday. In that case, we had
a production of energy, with no energy at all at the input. The same thing
happened in tests we made for our Customers, in the USA and in Europe.
You know what happens if you put any number upside a line of fraction and zero
below the same line.
This is why this mode is dangerous: before use it we need to know perfectly
the
theory. Where I need real help is the formulation of a solid theory; books can
help, but up to a certain point, here is a new chapter to write. Less than all
help comments of imbeciles (from Latin “imbacula”, not an offense at all) who
just say “it is impossible” , turn around, and go.
Warm regards,
A.R.
Useless to say that if you make just warmed water instead of steam the output
energy calculated is the same.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
