Dear Mr William: We used that extreme mode, closed doors, also for many hours, sometimes having troubles to stop the reactor. To stop the rreactor we cut the injection of hydrogen and increase the water flow to cool down the reactor. Warm Regards, A.R.
________________________________ From: noone noone <thesteornpa...@yahoo.com> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sat, January 22, 2011 9:09:28 AM Subject: [Vo]:Monday Update to Release Information on Self Sustain Mode Dear Mr Brian Robertson: I again want to return on your comment, because it is very important, and I forgot to say a thing that I deem important too. The same Professors of the University of Bologna who made the test of the 14th of January, had made a preliminar test, closed doors, on the 17th of December 2010. During that preliminar test, made to check the idoneity of their instrumentation, being closed doors we could make a mode of operation that, for safety issues, I cannot make in public, it is they made the reactor go also without the drive of the electric resistance. This preliminar test will also be described in the report that will be published on monday. In that case, we had a production of energy, with no energy at all at the input. The same thing happened in tests we made for our Customers, in the USA and in Europe. You know what happens if you put any number upside a line of fraction and zero below the same line. This is why this mode is dangerous: before use it we need to know perfectly the theory. Where I need real help is the formulation of a solid theory; books can help, but up to a certain point, here is a new chapter to write. Less than all help comments of imbeciles (from Latin “imbacula”, not an offense at all) who just say “it is impossible” , turn around, and go. Warm regards, A.R. Useless to say that if you make just warmed water instead of steam the output energy calculated is the same. Warm Regards, A.R.