Harry Veeder <hlvee...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > evidence is not relevant in this case; only if they can show that > > fixed-geometry systems with an electrostatic charge spontaneously warm > > up can they claim that something is "doing work". > > That is like saying it can't be cold fusion because > there are no gamma rays. > I think it is more like saying X cannot be cold fusion because there is no evidence of change to the nucleus; i.e., no transmutations. Also, their claim violates the First Law of Thermodynamics, as far as I can tell. - Jed
