>
>From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
>To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>Sent: Sun, February 27, 2011 9:45:55 PM
>Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hidden wire hypothesis redux
>
>
>Harry Veeder <hlvee...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>> evidence is not relevant in this case; only if they can show that
>>> fixed-geometry systems with an electrostatic charge spontaneously warm
>>> up can they claim that something is "doing work".
>>
>>That is like saying it can't be cold fusion because
>>there are no gamma rays.
>>
>I think it is more like saying X cannot be cold fusion because there is no
>evidence of change to the nucleus; i.e., no transmutations.
Choose your poison.
It is just rehtorical bluster.
>Also, their claim violates the First Law of Thermodynamics, as far as I can
>tell.
so maybe the laws of thermodynamics are flawed.
harry
