I pushed "send" too soon. I meant to add a critical point:

The 18-hour test proved that the device does, in fact, output 15 kW, so I do
not see how people can still argue that the first test was actually putting
out far less than that because of wet steam. I think the second test proved
that the first test was accurate. Therefore all this talk about the enthalpy
of wet steam must be a misunderstanding.

- Jed

Reply via email to