yes, I would think that a practical design would be to have a single large
flow system with several of the stainless reactors down inside the flow
instead of having a hundred widen copper tubes to make.
I also think that the additive is something that keeps the Ni surface
reduced and supports growth of nano structure on cheaper Ni micron level
material (like in his patent photos of 10 micron Ni particles).... something
like:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TX9-4VKXBWN-2&_user=10&_coverDate=06%2F30%2F2009&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=gateway&_origin=gateway&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1708626491&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=4569566755ac4e9d238e648daa8d4ceb&searchtype=a
All the Cu migration is a red herring. I think it is just a good fresh
surface of "nano" Ni that is important.
... perhaps a spill over catalyst but not as a major component.
Dennis
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Terry Blanton" <hohlr...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 6:25 PM
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Swedish physicists on the E-cat: "It's a nuclear reaction"
/ The used powder contains ten percent copper
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Dennis <den...@netmdc.com> wrote:
The patent drawings sure looks like cylinder type vessel containing Ni
and
surrounded by flowing water.
Yeah, and that is probably similar to the 12 kW reactor; but, the heat
variance over that amount of material required 5 heaters to control.
The much simplified single heater with a smaller output is actually an
ingenious modification, IMO. He probably solved the runaway issue and
that gave him confidence enough to make the 1 MW array. It will look
like several bumpy pipes feeding a steam chamber.
T
