The simplest explanation of this contradiction is that "they" do not want to tell what the isotopic ratio of Cu is- and will not tell till the scientific report of the Bologna Univ. is published. Unnnatural, natural? The first is a mistery at the 2nd power, the other a mystery at the 3rd power.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Mattia Rizzi <mattia.ri...@gmail.com>wrote: > On january 2010 "A new energy source" they say that the isotpic ratio of > Cu is nearly natural background. > Source: http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/FocardiSanewenergy.pdf > On March 2010 they correct it and say that isotopic ration of Cu is > different from background. > > http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3080659.ece/BINARY/Rossi-Focardi_paper.pdf > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
