Could another variable be the amount of time that the ash spends in the Rossi reactor? When the Reaction first begins, the isotopic ratios could be random in the same way that a few samples among a population will produce widely varied statistics.
But when the reactor runs for a very long time, the isotopic ratios begin to resolve around a natural distribution, much like a large statistical sample will produce a reliable description of a large population. The isotopic ratios might all depend (as a function of time) on the way the ash was produced. On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: > The simplest explanation of this contradiction is that "they" do not want > to tell what the isotopic ratio of Cu is- and will not tell till the > scientific report of the Bologna Univ. is published. > Unnnatural, natural? The first is a mistery at the 2nd power, the other a > mystery at the 3rd power. > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Mattia Rizzi <mattia.ri...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On january 2010 "A new energy source" they say that the isotpic ratio of >> Cu is nearly natural background. >> Source: http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/FocardiSanewenergy.pdf >> On March 2010 they correct it and say that isotopic ration of Cu is >> different from background. >> >> http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3080659.ece/BINARY/Rossi-Focardi_paper.pdf >> > > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > >
