I am a systems engineer who has spent his career reverse engineering legacy systems where no documentation or human expertise exists.
I have development an interest in cold fusion and am learning its ground rules. I have come to this site to learn from the experts... the best around. If I pursue wrong paths, I do not mean to offend, however, if my learning process offends too grievously, I will leave this site. So let me know is I am too much for you to bear in your response. On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Wow. I can see that science is a completely new field for you. > > > > Your take on this paper is bizarre and so removed from reality that I have > to ask – what is your real profession? > > > > This report is about magic numbers, which are tendencies. There is > absolutely nothing in this that supports this brain-dead idea of uniformity > in isotopes in cosmology. Sure, there are tendencies but they as so weak > that order-of-magnitude differences are the norm – not the exception. > > > > Geeze … we used to be able to have intelligent discussions here. > > > > Jones > > > > > > > > > > *From:* Axil > > > > Here is the theory that you are rejecting laid out in detail from Miley > > > > > http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/VISITING_FELLOWS&PROFESSORS/pdf/MagicQuarkTucson1.pdf > > "*Boltzmann Equilibrium of Endothermic Heavy Nuclear Synthesis in the > Universe and a Quark Relation to the Magic Numbers *" > > > > It is not Axil's theory, but one produced by Mille that I think most fits > the facts. > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > Fran, > > > > Ø Harry, I think it is more a matter of proving how the Casimir > environment is equivalent to the stellar environment. > > > > Which stellar environment? > > >
