Wow. I can see that science is a completely new field for you.
Your take on this paper is bizarre and so removed from reality that I have to ask - what is your real profession? This report is about magic numbers, which are tendencies. There is absolutely nothing in this that supports this brain-dead idea of uniformity in isotopes in cosmology. Sure, there are tendencies but they as so weak that order-of-magnitude differences are the norm - not the exception. Geeze . we used to be able to have intelligent discussions here. Jones From: Axil Here is the theory that you are rejecting laid out in detail from Miley http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/VISITING_FELLOWS <http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/VISITING_FELLOWS&PROFESSORS/pdf/MagicQuar kTucson1.pdf> &PROFESSORS/pdf/MagicQuarkTucson1.pdf "Boltzmann Equilibrium of Endothermic Heavy Nuclear Synthesis in the Universe and a Quark Relation to the Magic Numbers " It is not Axil's theory, but one produced by Mille that I think most fits the facts. On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: Fran, * Harry, I think it is more a matter of proving how the Casimir environment is equivalent to the stellar environment. Which stellar environment?
