If the waste is identical to the fuel, that means no reaction involving it actually occurred, by definition. The material is at best merely a catalyst for a reaction with other fuel and waste.
Sent from my iPhone. On Apr 15, 2011, at 22:52, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > The scam status of the Rossi reactor has nothing to do with natural abundance > in Lenr reactions. It has been shown that all Lenr reactions produce waste > conformant to natural abundance. Like all Lenr reactions, the Rossi reactor > show natural abundance in it’s ash product. This should lend credence to the > claim that the Rossi reaction is real and that it is a valid Lenr Reaction. > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Wait a minute. You want to change half the Standard Model of Physics in > order to suggest that Rossi's device has some tiny chance of being > theoretically possible in the oddball way that he thinks it is - when we're > not even sure that it's not a total scam? > > ... now that is true devotion to a cause <g> > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Harry Veeder > > Has anyone described the necessary chain of stellar events that would > produce > the present isotopic abundance of copper and is there proof that all those > events actually happened? > > My point is perhaps some elements/isotopes are formed naturally by a LENR > process rather than by a succession of stellar events. Therefore the reason > why the isotopic abundance produced by the Rossi reactor is natural is > because the Rossi reactor emulates how nature does it. > > Harry > > > > >
