Here is the theory that you are rejecting laid out in detail from Miley http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/VISITING_FELLOWS&PROFESSORS/pdf/MagicQuarkTucson1.pdf
"*Boltzmann Equilibrium of Endothermic Heavy Nuclear Synthesis in the Universe and a Quark Relation to the Magic Numbers ***" It is not Axil's theory, but one produced by Mille that I think most fits the facts. On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Fran, > > > > Ø Harry, I think it is more a matter of proving how the Casimir > environment is equivalent to the stellar environment. > > > > Which stellar environment? > > > > There are literally trillions of different stellar environments, all of > them unique because the mass of the predecessor star is unique, but there is > only one Casimir force. > > > > Are you suggesting that the Casimir force is different on every single > planet? I think not. > > > > Or that on earth, this force somehow “knows” what the stellar environment > was billions of years ago when the isotope balance was frozen into place, > and can now match it? > > > > I find that preposterous. Each of these stars can have drastically > different isotope balance, following a Nova. We know this as fact - because > we occasionally find meteorites that come from different systems, or even > from different time frames in the Nova that preceded earth. The isotope > balances are vastly different. > > > > For instance, this was what Luis Alvarez used to pinpoint the cause of the > last mass extinction. He found evidence of lots of iridium – and element > that is extremely rare on earth, but it is found at massively increased > levels (1000 times more) in the so-called K-T boundary layer. > > > > To imagine that LENR can operate to transmute elements in a way that > matches exactly one of trillions of stellar events, and that it also is the > exact match for the planet where the LENR occurs … LOL … think about the > odds. > > > > Jones > > > > >
