Reality check time:  One HP is about 700 watts.

If Rossi has found a way to get multiple kilowatts of energy out of a 1
HP pump motor, while still drawing off enough energy to keep the water
moving, I say more power to him.

That would be every bit as remarkable -- and valuable -- as getting
multiple kilowatts of energy out of a nickel/hydrogen reaction.


On 04/20/2011 06:12 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
> * *
>
> One final point on how potential energy, in the form of a high flow of
> water (l/sec) which comes from a one horsepower motor can be converted
> into a significant amount of energy in any device that can involve
> magnetostriction and/or cavitation. This is why you absolutely must
> include the pump motor as input.
>
>  
>
> Rothwell states (incorrectly) that it is "impossible to add measurable
> *friction* with this equipment (these pipes and pumps), and if you
> could somehow add it, they _would_ measure it....
>

I really don't think Jed said that.  I really don't think he ever
discussed adding _friction_ to the system, whatever that might mean. 
(He may have talked about adding _heat_, but that's something else again.)

(Cut and paste is valuable when quoting.... retyping is not always so
good.  That's sure not a direct quote of Jed, despite the quotation marks.)

> It would be present before you turn the cell on, and after you turn it
> off. It would not suddenly magically appear when you turn on the power
> to the resistors."
>
>  
>
> What he misses of course is the one place where he personally has seen
> small gain -- the Griggs pump, and the cavitation effect. How ironic
> in a way -- this is not friction per se, but it could be gainful.
>
>  
>
> And as we have been taking recently, there is every reason to suspect
> a magnetostriction effect on the nickel. It would be hard NOT TO HAVE IT.
>
>  
>
> This magnetostriction could easily operate like ultrasonics to convert
> pressurized high flow water into cavitation bubbles - and guess what
> sports fans - they _would not_ measure it at the start. It would be
> not be present before you turn the cell, on and after you turn it off.
> It does not show up till the heater fires up !
>
>  
>
> It would in fact "suddenly magically appear when you turn on the power
> to the resistors". Not only that, the cavitation itself could be
> slightly OU (if Griggs is slightly OU). In effect the 1 hp of
> pressurized water flow - combined with a magnetostriction effect could
> serve to convert the flow into kW levels of heat. This could be as
> much as 20% of the heat seen. I doubt it is that high, but we cannot
> rule out that it is even higher!
>

Well, we could rule it out, just possibly, if we were willing to admit
that conservation of energy might play some role here.


>  
>
> It is too much of a coincidence that the reactor loses it effect at a
> temperature which coincides with the Curie point of nickel; not to
> mention that the "resistors" have a magnetic field.
>
>  
>
> Jones
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>

Reply via email to