From: Jed Rothwell 

 

*  No, he did not get better results with the high flow. He got 16 kW on
Jan. 16, and 16 kW on Feb. 10, except for the  short time it went to 130 kW.


 

 

This is of course part of my ongoing disagreement with Rothwell.

 

In the first test the steam was wet steam, and the output was overestimated
by a factor of three. 

 

It was about 5 kW.

 

In the second test, we see triple the heat evolved due to the higher flow
rate. That could be overestimated too due to bad thermocouple placement but
not by a factor of three.

 

Jones

Reply via email to