> >From: Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Tue, June 21, 2011 9:28:08 PM >Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a hoax? > > >Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[email protected]> wrote: > > >How's this for a theory: The E-Cat is not boiling much of the water, only a >little. The pump is putting out more water than can boil, so it runs out the >hose. It's hot. >How hot? Always over 100 deg C? That's what the temperature shows. Also, when >they use a meter to measure steam quality, they find that the steam is dry. It >would be wet if it was mostly water. If the probe can recognize water-mist but can't discriminate between water-gas and other air-gases then I can understand how it can tell us the dryness of the steam plume. However if the probe can't distinguish between water-gas and water-mist it is useless for determining steam quality. Harry Harry
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- RE: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Mark Iverson
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Harry Veeder
- RE: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Mark Iverson
- RE: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Rich Murray
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a hoax? Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a hoax? Stephen A. Lawrence
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a hoax? Stephen A. Lawrence
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a hoax? Stephen A. Lawrence

