I wrote: > If the probe can recognize water-mist but can't discriminate between water-gas > and other air-gases then I can understand how it can tell us the dryness > of the steam plume. However if the probe can't distinguish between water-gas > and water-mist it is useless for determining steam quality. Actually if the probe could discrimate between all three, it could also tell us the dryness of the steam. That would also make it an impressive instrument! Harry
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- RE: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Mark Iverson
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Harry Veeder
- RE: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Mark Iverson
- RE: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Rich Murray
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a hoax? Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a hoax? Stephen A. Lawrence
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a ho... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a hoax? Stephen A. Lawrence
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a hoax? Stephen A. Lawrence
- Re: [Vo]:E-Cat proven to be a hoax? Stephen A. Lawrence

