At 08:50 PM 7/5/2011, Rich Murray wrote:
MISTer Joshua Cude, you are, as always, right...

No evidence at all for excess heat production...

From "defective evidence" to "no evidence" is a leap.

I just looked over the Kullander and Essen report, and what I see is that some assumptions were made. Those assumptions might be true, actually. What the actual data shows, however, is a heat anomaly that appears when the cooling water reaches 60 degrees C. The rate of increase shifts to an increased value that shows roughly doubled heat generation over input power.

They appear to be correct that the water would not boil if not for increased heat, though that is not a definitive showing, the heat curve looks like that, and the input power would not be enough to heat the apparent inplut flow more than 40 degrees, taking it to 60 degrees.

But that, again, depends on assumptions about input water flow, which wasn't nailed down.

Evidence is not proof, Rich.

What's confusing some people, such as Jed, and then others debating with Jed, is that Jed claims confidential information regarding Defkalion and other matters, that leads him to conclude that the Rossi results are real. That's evidence for him and not for us.

How much we want to believe his conclusions is a matter of personal judgment.

For myself, I look at Defkalion and I see what looks like management describing what their engineers have told them is possible. How much of this has been actually realized is unclear. Jed claims that there has been extensive testing, but we don't have confirmation on that, AFAIK, from the actual testing agencies. And what, exactly, was tested is not clear.

3 PM, March 27, 2011: We have operated ten devices supplied by Defkalion for three weeks, now, and they have not blown up, nor do they show any signs of impending failure. The devices did not exceed the rated external temperatures.

Memo from the Director of Safety Testing: Did you measure the generated heat?

Response from testing technician: No, of course not, that wasn't in the test specification. We did not see any explosions. We plugged them in to the power strip, added external temperature sensors, left the room, and then turned on the power. You want us to do something else?

Memo from Director. No. Never mind. I was just curious.

Report: Defkalion device passes safety tests, per specification 38026-D.

Reply via email to