I agree with what you say, however I cannot believe the story of the factory heated with such an generator. Actually it was a lot of involution in E-cats from the start till now (e.g. O/U from a spectacular 200:1 to a modest 6;1, power form 12 to 3 kW) but so much regress is not believable. Peter
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The answer to your question can be given only by experiment. > > > I gather the "question" being: Will this system run indefinitely without > input power? "Indefinitely" is an indefinite description, meaning I do not > know how long it might run. There is no question it would have run longer > than 4 hours. > > > Rossi claims his system is absolutely different >> from all the other LENRs so what happens in an Arata Cell is not valid for >> the E-cat. >> > > The fact that Rossi makes this claim does not prove the claim is true. He > does not "own" this reaction in the sense that he can declare what it is or > how it works. His opinion has no more authority than, say, that of Piantelli > or Storms. > > In their White Paper, Defkalion claimed that this reaction has nothing to > do with cold fusion. All of cold fusion researchers I know disagree with > them. > > > >> It is now the time Rossi should predict the duration of the >> 1 MW demo- and this cannot be a few hours. >> > > There is no indication this will be in heat-after-death mode. The > large-scale reactor that supposedly ran in a factory for months was not in > heat-after-death mode as far as I know. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
