A recent paper "Time-resolved hydrino continuum transitions with cutoffs at
22.8 nm and 10.1 nm"
http://www.springerlink.com/content/q8005267210x3568/fulltext.pdf
by R.L. Mills and Y. Lu published in The European Physical Journal D - Atomic,
Molecular, Optical and Plasma
Physics<http://www.springerlink.com/content/1434-6060/> now defines the hydrino
in the same terms of fractional Rydberg atoms that other researchers have
postulated for years. Previously Mr Mill's has cautioned others not to use his
"hydrino" label in referring to their own research or theories because it was
somehow different from fractional hydrogen, inverse Rydberg matter, condensed
hydrogen or other such terms. Now the tables are turned and perhaps we should
extract the same penalty and demand Mill's abandon the term hydrino since
inverse Rydberg hydrogen is already a known entity. I predict Mill's papers
will soon embrace the work of Jan Naudts that the hydrino or inverse Rydberg
state of hydrogen is actually relativistic. Mills has previously compared the
hydrino to hydrogen ejected from the suns corona at fractions of C but this
may have been very misleading. IMHO hydrogen accelerated to fractions of C
experiences time dilation like the accelerated twin paradox and "ages" very
SLOWLY relative to us on earth while hydrogen in Mill's Rayney nickel would
need to "age" very RAPIDLY. This would require us outside the Mill's reactor to
appear equivalently accelerated to fractions of C from the perspective of the
fractional Rydberg hydrogen in the reactor. Since we on earth can be
considered stationary on a luminal scale of velocity then it remains that the
fractional hydrogen inside the reactor must experience EQUIVALENT NEGATIVE
acceleration. This is opposite to normal time dilation. Casimir theory states
vacuum energy density is reduced between the Casimir geometry of skeletal
catalysts or the voids formed between Ni nano powders. This reduced density
phenomena only occurs at the nano scale as opposed to increased density which
requires an object to approach fractional values of C or equivalent
acceleration due to gravity on the scale of a black hole. The Casimir effect
manipulates energy density via suppression of longer vacumm energy wavelengths
[larger virtual particles can't fit between plates]. This does not require
exponentially higher energy to achieve velocities approaching C but depends
instead on physical properties of conductive material in specific geometries.
It directly modifies the energy density independent of any velocity.
The time delays for Plasma spectrum in Mill's paper also lend
support to Jan Naudt's proposal of a relativistic interpretation of the
hydrino. If truly relativistic then the fractional hydrogen and the spectrum
they emit locally when reacting with other local fractional hydrogen may be
effected by time dilation - Like the Twins paradox a local observer always
experiences normal time flow, It is only when the twins meet in a common
inertial frame that the effects of time dilation become apparent and likewise
it is only when the spectra emitted by the fractional hydrogen propagate out of
the skeletal catalyst that changes due to dilation can be measured. One might
assume that this effect would simply return the spectrum to normal condition
but claims regarding this Black Light plasma seem to indicate a relationship
between changes in bond state where fractional hydrogen is both disassociated
and then re-associated. IMHO there is difference between accomplishing
fractional Rydberg state changes between fractional atomic hydrogen vs
fractional molecular hydrogen where molecular hydrogen opposes fractional
changes more than atomic hydrogen and leads to a skewing of the spectrum
propagation when molecular bonds hold H2 in fractional states at odds with the
local energy density.
Regards
Fran
