> >> When you apply for any cold fusion related patent, they automatically >> reject it with a form letter. . . . >> > > >> >> Let me upload a copy: >> >> http://lenr-canr.org/Collections/PatentOfficeMemo.jpg >> > > That is a copy of their policy, not the form letter. Sorry for the > confusion. > > I tossed out my copy of the form letter, which a researcher gave me. I > should have scanned it. I will ask around for another copy. > > That jpg of a memo says only that applications about cold fusion should be stamped "cold fusion" for identification. Nowhere I can see does it say they should reject them. Perhaps they get so many silly and bad applications from whackoes that they need a form letter! I've seen that jpg of a memo before as evidence that USPO rejects cold fusion and it annoys me. It says no such thing.
How about you show us a strong application for a legitimate and obviously functional device that was rejected and what was done about it?
