Given that REAL is single, self-interactive, fractal and infinite in every
possible way, then it is a reasonable fantasy to guess that something like
"adjacent" "nearby" realms of yet undiscovered energetic things exist, able
to feed tiny to huge to infinite amounts of energy and momentum into our
realm in unexpected ways, just as in 1896 when unexpected and inexplicable
excess heat output appeared in ancient uranium atoms, with various lighter
weight heavy element inpurities, including lead -- so all of us have to
always be alert for black swan anomalies -- in the long run, more fun,
too... from an incompetent scientific layman and pragmatic skeptic...

the new realm was the nuclear, incredibly deep within the flighty little
clouds of the chemical level of electrons and a million times more
energetic... Anyone predict that?  Rutherford looked for and found proof
for the nucleus in 1911, using theory to measure the size and density of
the nucleus in the first nuclear scattering experiments with alpha
particles from radium, with the scientist peering at a screen in the dark,
counting the little flashes -- did he ever shiver, hair standing on end?
 Only 34 years to Hiroshima...

the output of the Sun in all directions for hundreds of millions of years
was a similar embarassment, until 1905, when E = MC^2 opened the door to
more of REAL a crack --

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Examining the web's limited oscillon information, it would appear that it
> is important that the powder not be bound to the side of the reactor as
> conjectured by others.  The powder must remain free and could be located
> in the center of the reactor as stated on the ecat.com web site.
>
>
>
> In defense of the “particles bound to the side of the reactor conjecture’
> made with the greatest respect to your opinion…
>
> I don’t yet see a justification that the powder must vibrate. In fact,
> Rossi has stated that the powder was in the micron range which may be too
> heavy to be affected by sub-nanometer quantum mechanical vibrations which
> affect atoms at very low temperatures.
>
> Rossi has indicated that his powder is micron sized. It is the tubercle
> surface coverings on the particles that are nano-sized. Vacuum energy
> springing forth from any particular point in space, is most probably too
> feeble to move a micron sized particle into motion.
>
> But the particle may need to be as small as those found in cold hydrogen
> dusty plasma. A dusty plasma contains tiny charged particles of dust (as
> typically found in space), which also behaves like a plasma. Plasma that
> contains larger particles is called grain plasma.
>
> The information we have about the Rossi reaction points to the formation
> of exotic hydrogen spices comprised of multiple atoms configured in a
> number of crystalline forms.
>
> It may be these plasma derived dust particles which are the subject to
> vibrations.
>
> Next, the temperatures within the Rossi reactor are above the Curie
> temperature of nickel which would remove any magnetic property interactions
> that are mentioned associated with these vibrations.
>
> However, Rydberg hydrogen crystals are exquisitely reactive to magnetic
> influence because of their electromagnetic characteristics.
>
> Furthermore, in living systems that have been referenced, nickel is seldom
> if ever involved, but hydrogen in some form or another are always found.
>
> In short, Rydberg hydrogen crystals may be the subject of the oscillon
> mechanism.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> Examining the web's limited oscillon information, it would appear that it
>> is important that the powder not be bound to the side of the reactor as
>> conjectured by others.  The powder must remain free and could be located in
>> the center of the reactor as stated on the ecat.com web site.
>>
>> Also, if oscillon activity does explain the anomalous heat in the Rossi
>> Reactor, it is easily understood why an external exciter is necessary, eg
>> the "frequencies" described by AR.
>>
>> Now comes the speculation for the heat source.  It definitely could be a
>> ZPF heat generator considering that the standing collisions could be
>> limiting the pair formation much like a Casimir cavity or could be allowing
>> rapid pair separation similar to the "mirror" discussed previously.
>>
>> In such case, the energy source could really be positron annihilation,
>> each one liberating 0.511 MeV.
>>
>> I think Ahern, et al have found the secret with this oscillon theory.  If
>> so, the new game begins.
>>
>> Here is a simple explanation of oscillons:
>>
>> http://www.raczynski.com/art/oscillon.htm
>>
>> T
>>
>
>

Reply via email to