Rossi is not the only show in town. There is good promise that there will be a hand full of other LENR events that will hold our interest over the winter. Rossi is just one of many interesting LENR players that are in the offing. First off, I am interested in what Brian Ahern of Ames National Laboratory has to say in early December. This will hold interest for quite a while. Ahern has also been guiding George Miley’s group at UIUC on this nanotechnology, and the group seems to be enjoying a great deal of success in the month of October. Interesting… Miley has been the patron saint of my LENR opinions for sometime now. Miley has researched Rydberg hydrogen species and I have not seen any deviation to reduce his interest in this possible causation. What is missing in Miley's theories includes exact details on how Rydberg species produces LENR power. Bose Einstein condensates were often mentioned as involved. But maybe this has been recently replaced with a new powder causation mechanism. It seems to me that the long term survival of the transiton metal lattice excludes nuclear reactions as we commonly understand them. "IT PROVIDES A CONCISE EXPLANATION FOR THE BIOENERGETICS OBSERVED IN ALL ASPECTS OF NATURE.” LENR in living systems also exclude traditional nuclear reactions. * * * * * *
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Rich Murray <rmfor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Given that REAL is single, self-interactive, fractal and infinite in every > possible way, then it is a reasonable fantasy to guess that something like > "adjacent" "nearby" realms of yet undiscovered energetic things exist, able > to feed tiny to huge to infinite amounts of energy and momentum into our > realm in unexpected ways, just as in 1896 when unexpected and inexplicable > excess heat output appeared in ancient uranium atoms, with various lighter > weight heavy element inpurities, including lead -- so all of us have to > always be alert for black swan anomalies -- in the long run, more fun, > too... from an incompetent scientific layman and pragmatic skeptic... > > the new realm was the nuclear, incredibly deep within the flighty little > clouds of the chemical level of electrons and a million times more > energetic... Anyone predict that? Rutherford looked for and found proof > for the nucleus in 1911, using theory to measure the size and density of > the nucleus in the first nuclear scattering experiments with alpha > particles from radium, with the scientist peering at a screen in the dark, > counting the little flashes -- did he ever shiver, hair standing on end? > Only 34 years to Hiroshima... > > the output of the Sun in all directions for hundreds of millions of years > was a similar embarassment, until 1905, when E = MC^2 opened the door to > more of REAL a crack -- > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Examining the web's limited oscillon information, it would appear that >> it is important that the powder not be bound to the side of the reactor as >> conjectured by others. The powder must remain free and could be located >> in the center of the reactor as stated on the ecat.com web site. >> >> >> >> In defense of the “particles bound to the side of the reactor conjecture’ >> made with the greatest respect to your opinion… >> >> I don’t yet see a justification that the powder must vibrate. In fact, >> Rossi has stated that the powder was in the micron range which may be too >> heavy to be affected by sub-nanometer quantum mechanical vibrations which >> affect atoms at very low temperatures. >> >> Rossi has indicated that his powder is micron sized. It is the tubercle >> surface coverings on the particles that are nano-sized. Vacuum energy >> springing forth from any particular point in space, is most probably too >> feeble to move a micron sized particle into motion. >> >> But the particle may need to be as small as those found in cold hydrogen >> dusty plasma. A dusty plasma contains tiny charged particles of dust (as >> typically found in space), which also behaves like a plasma. Plasma that >> contains larger particles is called grain plasma. >> >> The information we have about the Rossi reaction points to the formation >> of exotic hydrogen spices comprised of multiple atoms configured in a >> number of crystalline forms. >> >> It may be these plasma derived dust particles which are the subject to >> vibrations. >> >> Next, the temperatures within the Rossi reactor are above the Curie >> temperature of nickel which would remove any magnetic property interactions >> that are mentioned associated with these vibrations. >> >> However, Rydberg hydrogen crystals are exquisitely reactive to magnetic >> influence because of their electromagnetic characteristics. >> >> Furthermore, in living systems that have been referenced, nickel is >> seldom if ever involved, but hydrogen in some form or another are always >> found. >> >> In short, Rydberg hydrogen crystals may be the subject of the oscillon >> mechanism. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> Examining the web's limited oscillon information, it would appear that >>> it is important that the powder not be bound to the side of the reactor as >>> conjectured by others. The powder must remain free and could be located in >>> the center of the reactor as stated on the ecat.com web site. >>> >>> Also, if oscillon activity does explain the anomalous heat in the Rossi >>> Reactor, it is easily understood why an external exciter is necessary, eg >>> the "frequencies" described by AR. >>> >>> Now comes the speculation for the heat source. It definitely could be a >>> ZPF heat generator considering that the standing collisions could be >>> limiting the pair formation much like a Casimir cavity or could be allowing >>> rapid pair separation similar to the "mirror" discussed previously. >>> >>> In such case, the energy source could really be positron annihilation, >>> each one liberating 0.511 MeV. >>> >>> I think Ahern, et al have found the secret with this oscillon theory. >>> If so, the new game begins. >>> >>> Here is a simple explanation of oscillons: >>> >>> http://www.raczynski.com/art/oscillon.htm >>> >>> T >>> >> >> >
