My understanding is the coolant did, in Feb, go around the single Door
Knob style reactor core but it no longer does. IE the heat radiation
fins and the 3 cores embedded in lead. I have no real issues using a
heat exchanger as long as I get a real time digital readout of the water
flow rate into my data logger. As for the 6 Oct measurements, I do
accept the engineers who measure this stuff all the time saying the
measurements were close enough. I have looked at the videos and the data
collected. I agree with them. My delta T temp probe placements will be
in the middle of the water stream, inside the water hoses but not
touching the inside wall of the water hose.
AG
On 11/21/2011 2:48 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
<aussieguy.e...@gmail.com <mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I'm happy to replicate the 6 Oct 2011 test setup. In fact I'll
insist on it as then I know what to expect. I'll bring temp, water
flow and power input monitoring equipment, plus the digital cro
and the data logger. I'm not initially interested in self sustain
mode but will insist on at least 24 hours or as long as I can stay
awake powered mode measurements that show a min COP 6. I should be
able to stay awake for at least 48 hours with good Italian Short
Blacks.
You should replicate Levi's February test method, using a simple
liquid water (or glycol) coolant stream without making any steam.
There is no way to know that the October 6 setup really measured the
output heat correctly. I won't repeat all the reasons why or the
possible corrections again.
