That's enough with the personal attacks. So the client is the American military, who has hired Fioravanti to take possession of their goods, and though the branch wants to keep their identity secret, it nevertheless insisted on the publicity of the October 28th test?
Am I clear? On Nov 25, 2011, at 2:49, Marcello Vitale <mvit...@ucsbalum.net> wrote: > MY says there is no client. Let me explore the logical consequences of this > revelation. Because it's a fact. MY said it, and it fits Occam's razor, which > says (I am sure I don't need to remind you) that "whatever MY points to as > the simplest theory, is indeed true". > > Therefore, October 28 was all a big show, with actors and dancers. Yet, Rossi > is not turning around and selling retail, or selling stocks. Not making money > in any way. Not using the advertisement he paid for, if you will. It's as if > a company would launch a huge ad campaign, but not put the advertised product > in stores. "Buy my ecat! Available 2013! Please, don't send money now!" > > Ah, sure, except he is already making money: from those "secret investors > bound to strict secrecy agreements" who paid him in secret money drawn in a > secret currency nobody else knows about, which of course would at least > explain the financial crisis. Then, why did Rossi have to make that show, > anyway? Show the investors he is selling? Then they would start asking for a > return on the investment. No, no, the R&D money leeches are always just a few > weeks away from a salable product. It doesn't compute. > > Maybe he just wanted to laugh at us? Or maybe he wanted to make sure MY, > certainly his most feared competitor, was kept busy writing about it and not > do any work? But if Rossi is a scammer, the competitor of a scammer is > another scammer. OK, I guess I'm onto something, I think all the passages in > the logical chain do make sense, if one starts from the assumption that Rossi > is a scammer, arriving to the conclusion that MY is also a scammer seems > almost unavoidable. > > Which water car are you selling, MY? > > MY theory is the simplest! > > :-)))) :-))))) :-))))) > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Mary Yugo <maryyu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Charles Hope <lookslikeiwasri...@gmail.com> > wrote: > On Nov 24, 2011, at 19:49, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > He claims to have a self-destruct mechanism built in. > > OK. So you hire some munitions experts who defuse such things for a living. > If you buy a megawatt plant, you get 100 tries to disarm the mechanism. You > can try freezing it ... in liquid nitrogen if necessary. You can examine it > first non-destructively any way you want including the examination Rossi > forbade Celani to do during a demo. I can't believe for enough money you > couldn't break anything Rossi could put in. And remember, Rossi is limited > by safety issues. > > > Why did he promise to never sell to the military, then turn around to sell to > them as his flagship client? > > My theory is the simplest: that there is no client. > >
