On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <
zeropo...@charter.net> wrote:

> The only set of slide notes in the presentation said the following about
> WLT:****
>
> “The theory makes specific, testable predictions. Predictions that can be
> inexpensively verified.”****
>
>
>
Well, one prediction it makes is that "heavy" electrons absorb gamma rays
with near perfect efficiency. That should be testable. Not much else is.

And they say they've been working at this for several years. If these
predictions are so easy to test, why hasn't NASA done it?

Reply via email to