I wholeheartedly disagree with your statement,

"Resonance is very much a part of brute force physics."

 

I think I need to explain resonance to you.

Resonance is an interesting phenomenon where SMALL INputs of force or energy
into a system results in VERY LARGE OUTputs.  There is nothing resonant
about using EXTREMELY powerful magnets cooled with liquid helium to
accelerate atomic particles to EXTREMELY hi velocities and smashing them
head-on into each other.  The amount of energy INTO the system is EXTREME
and the energy out is paltry.  The situation there is opposite the
definition of resonance.  It's more akin to breaking a wine glass with a
12,000 lb wrecking ball, which is not resonance.

This is an odd instance of how my 'intuition' leads me to what I seek/need.

 

After reading your reply, I did some paying work, and then began doing some
web browsing and reading other Vortex postings, and after ~30 mins, I ended
up at the CMNS website; have no idea why I ended up there.  In the first
document I opened up, which was the latest online issue of their journal, I
came across the following article by Hagelstein, which I think is most
relevant to the issue of resonant atomic/nuclear processes.  Note his
comment,

 

"When we augment the spin-boson model with loss, we see that the coherent
energy exchange process improves

dramatically [10]. In perturbation theory we see that this comes about
through the removal of destructive interference,"

 

Coherent Energy Exchange in the Strong Coupling Limit of the Lossy
Spin-Boson Model

http://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/publications.htm

 

The following lengthy excerpt is from Vol. 5,

 

-------------------

"Hence, experiment suggests that the energy is probably nuclear in origin,
and that perhaps deuterons are somehow

reacting to make 4He. The big problem with such a statement is that there
are no previous examples in nuclear

physics of nuclear reactions making energy without commensurate energetic
particles [7]. So, whatever process that

is responsible for the effect is one that hasn't been seen before. There are
no previous relevant models in the nuclear

physics or condensed matter physics literature, and most scientists believe
the literature that does exist rules out any

possibility of such an effect.

 

This situation would change radically if there were a known mechanism which
could take a large nuclear scale MeV

quantum and convert it efficiently into a large number of optical phonons.
Such a scenario would be consistent with

recent two-laser experiments [8,9], where two weak lasers incident on the
cathode surface initiate an excess heat event

when the beat frequency is matched to zero-group velocity point of the
optical phonons, and the excess heat persists

after the lasers are turned off.  The excess heat effect initiated with a
single laser does not persist. The picture which

has been proposed to account for this is one in which the two lasers provide
an initial excitation of the optical phonon

modes which the new process requires; then, when the lasers are turned off,
the new process channels energy into the

same modes which sustains the effect.

 

To make progress given such a picture, we need to understand the conditions
under which a large nuclear energy

quantum can be converted into a large number of optical phonons. Once again,
there is no precedent for this; however,

it does seem to be what is going on in these experiments, and this motivates
us to explore theoretical models which

exhibit such an effect. Coherent energy exchange as a physical effect under
conditions where a large quantum is

divided into many smaller quantum is known in NMR and in atomic physics; it
is predicted in the spin-boson model.

However, the effect in the spin-boson model is weak, and we need a much
stronger version of it to make progress with

the excess heat effect in the Fleischmann-Pons effect.

 

When we augment the spin-boson model with loss, we see that the coherent
energy exchange process improves

dramatically [10]. In perturbation theory we see that this comes about
through the removal of destructive interference,

which drastically hinders the effect in the basic spin-boson model. In a set
of recent papers [10-13], we have been

discussing the model, and building up tools and results to try to understand
coherent energy exchange when the coupling

is stronger and when more quanta are exchanged. In the preceding paper [13],
we introduced the local approximation

for the lossy spin-boson model, which provides us with a powerful tool with
which to address the strong coupling

regime.

 

In this work, we continue the analysis by first introducing a numerical
algorithm which allows us to obtain eigen-

functions, self-energies, and indirect coupling matrix elements in the
strong coupling regime. As will be discussed,

once we began assembling the results from systematic calculations we noticed
that the system appeared to obey scaling

laws in the strong coupling regime. This is interesting because after
establishing the scaling laws, we can use them

to predict the dynamics of the model under conditions of extremely strong
coupling, which is where we need to go in

order to convert a nuclear-scale quantum into a very large number of atomic
scale quanta. Our primary goal then in

what follows in this paper is to discuss the scaling laws for self-energy
and for the indirect coupling matrix element in

the strong coupling regime."

-------------------

 

Why not use your brain to help Hagelstein and others, who are at least
open-minded enough to try thinking out of the box, to come up with a
plausible hypothesis to explain the 'current-theory-says-its-impossible'
evidence.

 

-Mark

 

Reply via email to