That's the evidence of testing "performed by others"? It's some sort of a detail-less, single-phase test from September of 2009! •AmpEnerco Run II –September 25, 2009, New Hampshire –64 liters H2O –TIn 23°C, TIn 46°C, time 4 hours –Average PIn <40 W, POut ~400 W, Gain ~10
This, in and of iteself does nothing to further confidence. And you do nothing to alleviate concerns with: "As you see this is Run II. There were several others. McKubre remarked that he knows a highly qualified person who was present. I know several, and I know of other independent tests. Some of them failed, like the NASA test. Others succeeded." If this was really a spectacular, definitive, independent test with qualified observers, and you have access to all of the details... great. For those of us playing the home game, it's blather. Forgive me for not seeing this block on the PowerPoint slide as the missing piece of the puzzle. Was the water flowing (and how was it measured) or was this a 64 liter basin? How was the input power measured? Was it continuously monitored, or only at the beginning? Was he using the big blue box? Did he adjust the power levels during the test? Was the input power measured again after any power controls were changed? You said Rossi was at the controls and these were AmpEnergo measurements with their own devices? Which variant of E-Cat was this? Did it have one or two heaters (resistors)? Was he using a Radio Frequency Generator at any point? Was anything recorded? Was any document produced? Are there names available for any observers that can be consulted? _________________________ Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:45:09 -0500 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Krivit article on NASA Forum From: jedrothw...@gmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Robert Leguillon <robert.leguil...@hotmail.com> wrote: /snip/ As long as a positive test is based purely on physics rather than his personal credibility, or it is performed by others (as some tests have been)... /snip/ What tests have been performed by others? Ampenergo, before they signed a contract. Mike McKubre discussed them in a recent lecture. See the lecture and slides here: http://lenr-canr.org/News.htm http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/McKubreMCHwhathappen.pdf As I have pointed out here before, if this machine was fake he would make it appear to work every time, on demand, especially when he has important visitors such as NASA. If he wanted to give it versimillitude perhaps he would have it fail when unimportant people come, or he would have it fail at first and then the next day start to work. That is not what has happened. In some cases it has gone for days without saying boo. That is characteristic of genuine cutting-edge prototype new technology, such as the early incandescent lights, internal combustion engines, transistors, and rockets. - Jed
