On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mary Yugo <maryyu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> I suspect you will take wild notions like mine more seriously if much >> more time passes without any absolutely definitive determination of Rossi's >> veracity. >> > > I consider the Oct. 6 test definitive. The chance of fraud is so low I do > not take that seriously. It is no more likely than a supernatural > event. Neither you nor any other skeptic has suggested any viable reason > why this demonstration was not definitive. You have never come up with a > method of committing fraud. If you could suggest a method, you would have > done so by now. > > You are asking us to believe in fraud with a trace of evidence for it. Not > a trace! You are a true believer clinging to an absurd hypothesis that is > contrary to the laws of physics. > > > Foot stomping. Nothing more.
