Am 08.12.2011 22:17, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
If somebody does not admit this, then he must be a blind mouse.
I not only admitted it, I emphasized it in my report. However, these
problems -- bad as they are -- do not negate the findings.
They do negate the findings. To prove a billion dollar invention, a
little bit more care is required.
This is not acceptable and triggers unnecessary doubts.
I pay not ten dollars for this.
I use more care and brain when I measure a semiconductor with 5° accuracy.
If you think
they do, I suppose you do not know much about measuring temperatures.
I know enough. This is a simple measurement. Not much accuracy is
required to prove a COP of 6.
But he did not manage to solve this simple problem.
I
invite you to demonstrate your assertions with actual tests, rather than
words.
No. Rossis methods are so crappy, he must proof the correctness.
I will check your claim about plastic wrap. I do not think it will
cause a measurable difference.
I also dont think. It does not matter, because the precise construction
of Rossis arrangement and the temperature gradient is unknown.
- Jed
