Peter Heckert <peter.heck...@arcor.de> wrote: > > By this, I mean to make >> devices as similar as possible as Rossi's and to show that the >> experimental >> results K&E and Lewan got could be obtained by mismeasurement rather than >> LENR heat production. >> > Possibly it is sufficient to test the heat exchanger. >
No, that is not sufficient. Even if you can prove the heat exchanger is flawed and the thermocouple is positioned incorrectly, that is an unimportant side issue. If you wish to disprove these claims, you must demonstrate by conventional means that you can keep a reactor of this size at boiling temperatures for 4 hours, while it remains too hot to touch. Skeptics should confront the facts head on, instead of raising petty objections to unimportant aspects of the test. If you seriously believe these results are in error, or that this can done with conventional stored energy or some sort of hidden chemical device, prove it. You claim violates so many established laws of physics, you will win the Nobel prize. - Jed
