So you did not read the last 2 pages? Where an expert in steam quality,
measured and made adjustments in the order of -2% to the energy output.
There was no invalidation, no matter how much you wish there was.
On 12/11/2011 5:38 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com
<mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Mary Yugo <maryyu...@gmail.com
<mailto:maryyu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> I can't access that paper at the moment -- the site
> returns an "account suspended" error.
He just needs to buy bytes. But Jed posted the Levi report here:
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LeviGreportonhe.pdf
Thanks. That's one of the many experiments which assumes the water
was completely evaporated. There's no evidence whatever that it was.
A small portion of liquid water would totally invalidate the result.
It's typical of a run which has been widely and properly criticized.
