Would someone tell me if this a sincere paper? Perhaps I have grown cynical over the last year, because of Rossi's dismissal of scientific practice and the new level of secrecy surrounding LENR research, but I'm remain very skeptical. To me the pictures look like dummy apparatuses which mock Rossi work. I have been told that "lie" could be a short hand for lie-algebra, but it looks like a double entendre. Also the numerous references of independent verifications sounds like a cliche, and I role my eyes whenever someone propose a new kind of matter and names it after themselves.
Harry On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > A pretend paper mocking LENR research. > Harry > > PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL > CONFERENCE ON LIE-ADMISSIBLE TREATMENT > OF IRREVERSIBLE PROCESSES (ICLATIP - 3) > Kathmandu University, Nepal, April (2011) pages 163-177 > > http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/ICNF-3.pdf >
