Jed can answer that, but it wouldn't surprise me if he was the guy who threatened Jed with a lawsuit when Jed wanted to include his papers on lenr.org... he is definitely a rogue researcher, and a bit course, but some of that probably comes from the way his work has been treated by mainstream journals. -m
-----Original Message----- From: Harry Veeder [mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 9:21 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mock paper How come none of Santilli's papers are in the LENR-CANR library? eg. http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/ICNF-1.pdf Has he attended the ICCF meetings? Has Jed or any of Jed's associates met him? Harry On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Mary Yugo <maryyu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Would someone tell me if this a sincere paper? Perhaps I have grown >> cynical over the last year, because of Rossi's dismissal of >> scientific practice and the new level of secrecy surrounding LENR >> research, but I'm remain very skeptical. To me the pictures look >> like dummy apparatuses which mock Rossi work. >> I have been told that "lie" could be a short hand for lie-algebra, >> but it looks like a double entendre. >> Also the numerous references of independent verifications sounds like >> a cliche, and I role my eyes whenever someone propose a new kind of >> matter and names it after themselves. > > > > What I get at the link seems entirely serious to a brief browse though > I have not read it yet. The home page looks serious also: > http://www.santilli-foundation.org/ so, unless someone hacked them, > the paper will also be serious, as far as they are concerned anyway.
