On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Harry Veeder <[email protected]> wrote:
> Would someone tell me if this a sincere paper? Perhaps I have grown > cynical over the last year, because of Rossi's dismissal of scientific > practice and the new level of secrecy surrounding LENR research, but > I'm remain very skeptical. To me the pictures look like dummy > apparatuses which mock Rossi work. > I have been told that "lie" could be a short hand for lie-algebra, but > it looks like a double entendre. > Also the numerous references of independent verifications sounds like > a cliche, and I role my eyes whenever someone propose a new kind of > matter and names it after themselves. > What I get at the link seems entirely serious to a brief browse though I have not read it yet. The home page looks serious also: http://www.santilli-foundation.org/ so, unless someone hacked them, the paper will also be serious, as far as they are concerned anyway.
