Also if it is just an extra dose of powder: How do you contain the
vacuum..? What kind of cheap and save mechanism could it be to contain
the vacuum? Or to create a new one after refueling? Or will the reactor
core completely be replaced and recycled in a factory?
Wolf
At a minimum a replaceable cartridge needs to have an additional
supply of hydrogen - and that means a sealable connection (not
something you would necessarily trust a muppet consumer with - a lot
of people don't even know how to tighten a nut. Also if we are to
believe recent speculation about RF excitation that that would need to
be delivered to the inside of the cartridge somehow.
My speculation is that it is just the addition of an extra dose of
powder through a sealable port into an oversized reaction chamber -
the old powder may be somewhat inert but the new powder's activity
isn't hampered by the presence of the old.
On 12 January 2012 23:56, Alan J Fletcher <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
At 03:46 PM 1/12/2012, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
Yes it is a BIG change. The reactor design must be VERY
different. It is a good development. Go Rossi Go.
It must be an integrated Nickel+Hydrogen cartridge.
