If they are so much behind expectations, why would they say 10KW or more for each Hyperion? Are they lying?
2012/1/30 Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> > Do not fool yourself – the lab is adequate. What on earth were you > expecting to see- something from CERN funded by the taxpayer ? **** > > ** ** > > What is curious is the chart on the laptop. Blow it up. Of course, we do > not know what it purports to show, but the two spikes are indicative of > what have been known to appear in many early H2 fractional hydrogen > experiments in the past.**** > > ** ** > > One possibility is based loosely on the Mills/Jansson video. First, there > is application of heat (note that the Hyperion has no external heater, and > the location of an internal heater is not clear). Then there is ignition > and a strong spike. This is exactly what happens in the Mills’ “solid > state” reactor, which is more sophisticated than this, but similar in > appearance. Following the spike, there is a massive drop off in > temperature, followed by a continuing slide. Next, there is another spike – > indicative of either a second burst of H2 being added or some other > stimulant (RF?).**** > > ** ** > > This happened back in November. It indicates that DGT is months behind > where everyone assumed they were at this time, and 4-5 years behind Randell > Mills in similar testing.**** > > ** ** > > Jones**** > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
