I have confessed more times that I cannot understand and/or predict Rossi's reactions (his own, not those from the core of the E-cat) In this case my bet is that now he will ask more money, 2 or 3 million US$ for a 'perfect" test. Let's see! Peter
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:00 PM, <pagnu...@htdconnect.com> wrote: > > Better still, if Smith is convinced the e-cat is not real, why not pledge > the $1M to a worthy cause if it's not verified by end of 2012? > - or offer bets through an on-line site like intrade.com? > > Otherwise, it's hard to be sure he's not a flamboyant publicity seeker. > > > > > An X-Prize would be an excellent idea. I hope that Mr. Smith gives this > > concept serious consideration. > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Robert Lynn <robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com> > > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > > Sent: Tue, Feb 14, 2012 2:20 pm > > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Do you think Rossi will still be too busy? > > > > > > The media are going to love this, and they will be very damning if Rossi > > doesn't accept. > > > > > > If he is prepared to put such money on the line it would be nice if Smith > > opened this up to all-comers, like an X-Prize, eg for a consistently > > replicable cold fusion reaction with a gain of 5-10 and power output > >1kW. > > > > > > On 14 February 2012 18:50, Alan J Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote: > > > > > > At 08:14 AM 2/14/2012, Chemical Engineer wrote: > > > > Smith Offers $1 Million Prize for Successful E-Cat Demo > > > > > > > > > > My offer is very simple, which I will restate: I ask you to repeat the > > March 29, 2011 demonstration purported to show that your E-CAT unit had > an > > output power of many times the input power through LENR (low energy > > nuclear reactions). > > > > As the sole judges as to whether this can be repeated correctly, I > suggest > > we use the two Swedish scientists, Kullander and Essen, as they attended > > the March 2011 demonstration and wrote a report. I would be happy to > > cover any reasonable cost of having them flying to Italy to attend the > > repeat of the demonstration. They can then check the wires (because, as > > you know, there have been claims that the wiring may have been > > misconnected) and also the power output of the unit in relation to both > > the heated water and the steam. > > > > > > > > I understand the 29 March 2011 demonstration took place over a period of > > more than six hours and showed a power multiplication of approximately > ten > > times. To make the demonstration test even fairer, I would be happy if > > the demonstration to qualify for the assignment of the USD1,000,000 were > > reduced to a five-hour period and with a power multiplication ratio of at > > least eight times. This will make it very much easier for you to qualify > > for the USD1,000,000, As far as I am concerned, eight times’ power > > multiplication through LENRs will solve the world’s power problems for > > the future. > > > > > > > > I don't know why he wants to go back to March 29, and not, for example, > > the Oct 5 (was it?) Heat Exchanger version, and to use steam rather than > > water. > > Also, Rossi only guarantees COP=6, not 8. > > > > K&E would be fine to supervise ... but I think I'd go with > recommendations > > from Jed (ISTR) to hire an HVAC company to certify the tests with > > callibrated equipment, etc etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
