Rossi Statement to Florida inspector: The following incident report was made on March 1 by a James Stokes:
I spoke to Dr Rossi concerning the construction and operation of his E-cat device. He stated the active ingredients are powdered nickel and a tablet containing a compound which releases hydrogen gas during the process. The output thermal energy is six times the electrical energy input. He acknowledged that no nuclear reactions occur during the process and that only low energy photons in the energy range 50-100 keV occur within the device. There are no radiation readings above background when the device is in operation. Since the device is not a reactor, the NRC does not have jurisdiction. Since there is no radioactive materials used in the construction and no radioactive waste is generated by it, the State of Florida, Bureau of Radiation Control has no jurisdiction. Currently, all production, distribution and use of these devices is overseas. Dr Rossi has arranged to meet with Underwriter Laboratories (UL) to seek approval for manufacturing in the United States. I thanked Dr Rossi for his time meeting with me. On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, David Roberson wrote: > Excellent comments Robin. I have a couple of items to discuss further. > > ---------- > >Behavior of my mental experimental device begins with a proton removed a > long > distance from the nucleus such that the force measured on my demon is > virtually > zero. As I turn the screw the proton approaches the nucleus and the force > measured between is mostly coulomb since it operates over vast distances > as > compared to the strong force. Very tiny amounts of electromagnetic energy > are > released > > >>Not at his point. Up till now, energy is being consumed. There is no > energy > release (as you point out yourself here below ;) . > ---------- > I mentioned the tiny amount of electromagnetic energy to make the > suggestion that any acceleration of the proton with its positive charge > during the process would generate a minute amount. I was pretty sure that > someone would point that out if I did not include it. Thanks for > supporting my actual supposition. > > > > --------------- > >The most important aspect of this procedure is that all of the energy can > be > released in the form of mechanical energy and there is no release of gamma > radiation whatsoever. > > >>Here you make the assumption that the final product will be Copper in > it's > ground state. In reality that may not be the case. Furthermore, depending > on the > Nickel isotope that you start out with the final Copper nucleus may be > subject > to beta decay (a slow process), resulting in longer term radioactivity. > (e.g. > Cu61). > --------------- > I am in fact assuming that a nickel isotope that results in the production > of a stable copper isotope is used by my demon. I intentionally chose one > that did not undergo beta decay for the reason you suggest. > > > > > ---------------- > >The mass loss associated with binding energy is converted entirely into a > safe > form that cannot be detected by a radiation detection device. I contend > that > this might explain why LENR reactions of some types behave in this manner. > Of > course a demon of this nature is not going to be available, but perhaps > the > implication is that all we require is a strong coupling mechanism that > retards > the motion of the proton as it makes it path into the nucleus of the > target > atom. The electric fields associated with the electron cloud could be a > factor, > as could other electromagnetic couplings. > > >>Nothing is going to retard the proton once the nuclear force gets it's > claws > into it. However as I have previously suggested, a fast particle can carry > the > energy away. E.g. an electron or a proton, or even multiple protons (from a > condensate). > -------------------- > Robin, I am trying to understand the origination of the gamma radiation in > this case which apparently does not show up in many of the actual LENR > devices. In my vision I see the rapidly accelerating proton under the > influence of the strong force emitting the gamma. Is it well understood > what the actual radiating mechanism consists of? If the rapidly > accelerating charge is the source then we could slow down that progression > with the external coupling to other protons, etc. That is what I am > seeking. > > > ------------------- > >Of course, the nucleus itself would tend to slow down any proton heading > in its > direction until the strong force intervenes. > > >>Note however that it's only after this point that excess energy becomes > available - as your demon has demonstrated. > ---------------------- > > I was attempting to cover the radiation that results from the rapid > deceleration of the proton as its kinetic energy is being converted into > barrier energy. This is a much slower process than that due to the strong > force once the proton is in that region. I do not think that a significant > amount of electromagnetic radiation is emitted during the > coulomb controlled phase of the real life processes. There most likely is > some energy emitted but nothing as compared to the rapid acceleration due > to the strong force. > > In real life I expect the decelerating and then accelerating proton to > radiate energy throughout the entire process. Net energy must be given to > the proton externally unless it is moving very fast with enough kinetic > energy to exceed the barrier requirement by itself. I believe that the > hot fusion process assumes that the kinetic energy of the proton would be > sufficient to overcome the potential barrier energy. As you are > suggesting, energy is required to be absorbed by the proton-nucleus system > until the strong force dominates and begins to return more energy than was > absorbed. This is true for my demon system but an interesting thought just > occurred to me. If this were a hot fusion reaction, all of the energy > could be contained within the proton-nucleus combination before the > collision begins. There might be sufficient kinetic energy between the two > reactants to exceed the coulomb barrier ahead of time. Under these > conditions the kinetic energy is converted into potential energy as the two > approach. Sufficient energy conversion would allow the proton to be > grabbed by the strong force. > > I wonder if it is a general condition that LENR reactions do not have the > coulomb barrier energy stored in the form of kinetic energy while hot > fusion does? I can see where that might make a substantial difference in > behavior. > > > > ---------------------- > >>The proton doesn't radiate anything. Once it has formed a Copper > nucleus, that > new nucleus is in an excited state, and it is this Copper nucleus which > radiates > (unless it has already managed to dispose of the energy via one or more > fast > particles). > ---------------------- > My demon would convert the strong force induced binding energy into > mechanical energy. It is well trained. Why would an extremely rapidly > accelerating proton not radiate electromagnetic energy? I know that the > strong force operates over a short distance, but surely it is not > infinitesimal. This type of process appears to be an ideal candidate for > the source of gamma radiation as the proton enters the nucleus. I can also > see where the proton might be moving at an extremely high velocity due to > strong force acceleration as it strikes the nucleus. Perhaps that imparts > a large amount of energy to the nucleus that then must escape by other > means. We have a pretty good calculation of the net amount of energy that > is released by the mass loss but I guess the question is how can this > energy be distributed to other things such as the particles you mention or > my demon. What determines how the energy escapes? > ----------------------- > > > > >I have been searching for any type of mechanism that would reduce the > high > energy radiation associated with nuclear reactions and maybe this can be > achieved since my demon suggests that a retardation effect would allow the > exact > same amount of energy to be released over a longer period of time and thus > at > lower frequencies. > > >>Talk to Fran, though I fail to understand how his mechanism would allow a > *single* high energy photon emitted from the nucleus turn into *multiple* > low > energy photons observed externally. > ---------------------- > This is my dilemma as well. I think that a mechanism must be found that > prevents the high energy gammas in the first place. If the radiation is > from the proton entering the nucleus we have a chance. If the occurs after > that point then it is hard to imagine how it can be tamed. I am pursuing > the proton radiation mechanism since we know that the gammas are not > escaping the devices and I can not picture a foolproof method of stopping > them after they exist. > > > > ----------- > >The lack of beta plus radiation prevents him from loosing energy due to > neutrino escape and the dangerous levels of 511 keV gammas associated with > the > positron-electron annihilation. Some of the puzzle pieces seem to fit > nicely > into place. > > >>Someone mentioned previously on Vortex that Rossi later said that it > wasn't a > nuclear reaction. Can anyone point to Rossi's statement in that regard? > ------------- > I saw that statement earlier when Rossi was concerned about his device > being considered a nuclear reactor of some type. Apparently that would > make it much harder to certify for home use. The manufacturing of a > reactor also had serious complications that are avoided by his statement. > ------------ > > > > Dave >
