You appear to favor quantum singularities. What evidence do you have that they are real? I am not aware that anyone has proven that they exist, and this would be a great time for you to point out some sources of information.
I think we should also give consideration to standard physics as we seek an explanation. First, we need to be sure that this thing is real. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Chemical Engineer <cheme...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Thu, Aug 9, 2012 8:56 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Noble Gas Plasma Engine: inside piccy This is not chemistry. It is high energy particle & quantum physics. I believe you can collide just about any gas particles and end up with a collapsed singularity if you add enough energy at point and time of collision. To minimize energy required, use a smaller vessel/voids(down to quantum sizes) and use a simple gas (such as Hydrogen) with just a proton and electron. Once you create the quantum singularity you are then playing with a nuclear furnace... On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:46 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson <orionwo...@charter.net> wrote: Addendum: The fact that Nobel gasses are involved really baffles me. My limited understanding of chemistry would suggest to me the fact that there shouldn’t be any kind of reactive “chemistry” involved, period… other than ionic excitation such as what we see in neon signs. What the hell is causing what I assume has been “accurately” measured to be an unusually large amount of mechanical energy, an amount of mechanical energy that has yet to be explained by conventional physics. If McKubre is willing to be have his portrait taken in the accompanying videos, that tells me there must be something going on here really that needs to be taken seriously. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
