That would be an interesting development if true.  Ball lightning is 
fascinating.

How would a coil enhance the formation of ball lightning?  This does not seem 
to make sense to me.

One thing I have seen over the years is an inductor getting quite hot due to 
some form of oscillation.  If the gas mixture effectively generates a negative 
resistance(?) then a parallel resonance consisting of the coupled coil and some 
stray capacitance can oscillate.  The level of oscillation will continue to 
rise until something acts as a limit.  In this case it appears that the limit 
is quite high.

I can not help but to question this information as it seems out of this world.  
I guess the Poof is out there.

Dave


-----Original Message-----
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Sun, Aug 12, 2012 7:50 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:the Coil


I have the answer to why the gas leaves the cylinderand it is not 
teleportation. 
Ball lightning is Rydberg matter, and balllightning has been known to pass 
through solid walls.
If highly excited atoms have no coil toconfine them to the center of the 
cylinder, they will pass through the cylinderwalls in the same way that ball 
lightning can pass through solid walls.
Simple, the Papp engine is making ball lightning.

Cheers:  Axil


On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:


did the "reaction" produce heatunder those circumstances?

Unknown.
 
The only instance of heat production that Ihave run across is during the 
“anomaly”.
A coil wrapped according to the original Pappspecs in the patent, is heated as 
the noble gases are teleported out of thecylinder ending in a vacuum in the 
cylinder. After the Pop is initiated, thecoil is moved away from the portion of 
the cylinder that supports the gas. Onlythe copper of the coil is heated and 
not the plastic spool that supports thecopper wire. 
This heat is produced even when the coil isgrounded.
See these YouTubes for specifics:
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=Z0IPWmm7GDc
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=jlgiwB8V4sc
 
Cheers:  Axil

 
 



On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote:

did the "reaction" produce heat under those circumstances?

Harry


On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In a video of the Papp engine that was fitted with a transparent cylinder
> sleeve, no coil was used so that the reaction could be seen. The piston
> sometimes moved but not with any force.
>
>
>
> Cheers:    Axil
>
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> does that mean the piston does not move?
>> Harry
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Removing the coil disables the Papp reaction.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Cheers:    Axil
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> sorry if this has already been discussed, but does the papp engine
>> >> heat up if the coil is removed?
>> >>
>> >> Harry
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:37 PM,  <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>> >> > In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:34:44 -0400:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> > [snip]
>> >> >>(*C12* is C12 in an excited state - it has an additional 15.96 MeV
>> >> >> that
>> >> >> it*
>> >> >>* *
>> >> >>
>> >> >>*desperately wants to get rid of)*
>> >> >>
>> >> >>This is only true when the coulomb barrier is up at full strength.
>> >> >> But
>> >> >> when
>> >> >>the coulomb barrier is completely down, protons behave like neutrons.
>> >> >> They
>> >> >>can exit the nucleus with no energy penalty.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>I explain this in the thread “the bumpy road.”
>> >> >
>> >> > If there were no energy penalty to protons (or neutrons) leaving the
>> >> > nucleus,
>> >> > then the nucleus would fall apart. This doesn't happen.
>> >> >
>> >> > BTW the Coulomb barrier is partially a misnomer. It's a Coulomb
>> >> > barrier
>> >> > for
>> >> > positively charged particles trying to enter the nucleus, but
>> >> > actually a
>> >> > nuclear
>> >> > binding force barrier for particles trying to leave the nucleus.
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards,
>> >> >
>> >> > Robin van Spaandonk
>> >> >
>> >> > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>








 

Reply via email to