Did Bob Papp remove the coil for the demo? Did you see the poper work with the coil installed; any differences? Was the pisten movement strong? What was the cylinder made of? Other details?
Axil On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:46 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Bob Papp told me, last Friday, that the coil is not only not necessary, > but doesn't significantly assist the function. He repeatedly fired off a > cylinder without the coil as a demonstration. > > Part of my motivation to visit was to make sure that the (non-heat > engine) mechanical force was not simply a plasma pinch driven by the coil. > Obviously, it wasn't. > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The question: >> Why is the axial confinement coil required in the papp engine. The Papp >> reaction will not work without the coil. >> The answer: >> When the plasma is formed, the coil confines plasma into a very thin >> conductive channel where one dimensional electron flow along the channel >> makes the current superconductive. A electron screening cloud forms >> together with Rydberg matter in the partial plasma. This causes aneutronic >> fusion of three helium atoms into Boron11 and a proton. >> >> This is consistent with the finding of a brown ash in the Papp engine as >> a nuclear ash. >> >> Cheers: Axil >> > >
