The 3rd Sterling video from the tesla tech discussed 2 coils in each cyclinder, one for compression & one for containment. Rossi had two sets of wires leading into his tubular heater...
If you do not use the coils for containment and compression of ions, you will require much higher voltage for ignition. On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Did Bob Papp remove the coil for the demo? Did you see the poper work with > the coil installed; any differences? Was the pisten movement strong? What > was the cylinder made of? Other details? > > Axil > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:46 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Bob Papp told me, last Friday, that the coil is not only not necessary, >> but doesn't significantly assist the function. He repeatedly fired off a >> cylinder without the coil as a demonstration. >> >> Part of my motivation to visit was to make sure that the (non-heat >> engine) mechanical force was not simply a plasma pinch driven by the coil. >> Obviously, it wasn't. >> >> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> The question: >>> Why is the axial confinement coil required in the papp engine. The Papp >>> reaction will not work without the coil. >>> The answer: >>> When the plasma is formed, the coil confines plasma into a very thin >>> conductive channel where one dimensional electron flow along the channel >>> makes the current superconductive. A electron screening cloud forms >>> together with Rydberg matter in the partial plasma. This causes aneutronic >>> fusion of three helium atoms into Boron11 and a proton. >>> >>> This is consistent with the finding of a brown ash in the Papp engine as >>> a nuclear ash. >>> >>> Cheers: Axil >>> >> >> >
